The meaning of consciousness

The event as a fact of life and a fact of consciousness
In an informal way event within the framework of being identified by the indication of the crossing of a border, a violation of some established patterns. That is not all of what happened-happened, but only what goes beyond the established “order of things” receives the event status.

You could try to give a formal definition of events, with Georg Henrik von Brighton concept of the situation and call the event a significant change in the situation (Wright, 1986). Immediately, however, the question arises, what should be the extent of changes to be considered “significant”. In addition, it is intuitively clear that the same incident may be an event in one respect and not in another event, there is a significant “point and direction reference”, not only the deviation (the event is rather a vector, not a scalar). It seems that there is no event at all, and there is an event for something or someone. Geological disasters (phenomena of inorganic nature) are important events for the life on the Earth (phenomena of organic matter), for it contributed to the emergence and development, as well as to communities, as were the aftershocks of bloom and death of civilizations.

Things happen in Genesis and same for Genesis. However, although events can occur (and often occur) independently of the mind, identification of an event as event and its interpretation (by introducing the corresponding context) is the prerogative of consciousness.
Routine of life is consciousness. Only changing the world becomes a fact of consciousness. The tendency to “make the equation” constants and retention of variables is, apparently, a fundamental property of a living consciousness. We tend “not to see” the faces of familiar people but only to notice and distinguish the expressions of these persons. Attach on in the institutions entrance signs asking them not to slam doors gives only temporary effect and then becomes something of a litmus test to distinguish permanent staff from the visitors (the first clap, the second not).

Practical reason do not tend to operate with constants. If the result of a fire at a gas station ended with the conclusion that the cause of fire were: the presence of a gas station, flammable substances and free access of oxygen, there would be doubts about the competence of the investigative bodies, though their conclusion would be theoretically perfect. Constants can be entered only in the mind specially. Takes a lot of effort of a psychoanalyst in order to raise awareness for the patient as the amount of stable and permanent of his inclinations. And this bring not only itself becomes event and through the event.

The range of existence and range of consciousness can each go their course, be kept separate and not korrespondiruet with each other. A passerby walks down the street, lost in her thoughts, without being distracted by what is happening around. You want something extraordinary, what would he pay himself for his thoughts. Genesis breaks into the consciousness of the event. The event is what attracted the attention, impressed, excited and even shocked. The event raise questions and focuses on his work of consciousness up until after conceptualization-description shall not receive the interpretation-evaluation.

The interpreted event is not retained in consciousness, slipping away from him, leaving behind memories. ( does this Mean that to capture the event and after the interpretation of the events of consciousness is besometimes? Apparently, it is not. Consciousness is not occupied by the actual event, going through (chews?) the events of the past or anticipating future events. That’s why consciousness is always excited (or concerned).

3 thoughts on “The meaning of consciousness

  1. Thus, the congregation facilitated the experience of restriction of freedom, creating your own secluded world of equal people. But I paid for it was a considerable loss of individuality due to the “dissolution” in society. To live in such close community, need such specific psychological traits as focus on others, the ability to consider the interests of others, ability to establish and maintain contacts with other people. In such conditions life was good for those who could have the satisfaction of participation in a common cause, to feel belonging and inclusion, to feel unity with their surroundings.

    Liked by 1 person

    Reply
  2. Psychodramatic analysis of conflicts in life with thorough development of the Central episodes, multidimensional scan often ends, ends with the construction of a generalized picture which can grasp the eye and hear the ear almost instantaneously. The basic techniques of simultanesouly events are in psychodrama living sculpture and choir. Although the living sculpture is sometimes used in psychodynamic and technology, but there it is used primarily a means of expressing relationship, rather than the image event. It is rather a picture of a force field, not deployed processes. In psychodrama the living sculpture is used to recreate real and imaginary (e.g., dreaming) stories. This is personified not only people, but inanimate objects and imaginary forces. Presents simultaneously, with their peculiar plasticity and expressiveness, they are the Foundation for the formation of a visible image of the event the inclusion of forces, invisible in everyday life. As separate figure of this painting during the preliminary psychodramatic studies are already vested for all members of the group (and especially for the protagonist) the particular values and meanings, a simple look at this seemingly unassuming song can sometimes cause extraordinary emotional reactions.

    Liked by 1 person

    Reply
  3. expansion of space of events is the organization and conduct of the game “Psychological chess”. Here a significant portion outwardly expressed, “private” is revealed not by answers to the questions posed after the event, and due to the special structure of the game in which participants record in writing not only outwardly Express our reactions (“external voice”), but minutes shall be kept of the reactions of the “inner voice”. The connection of the three protocols (one of the “external” dialogue partners and two series of mental reactions both) allows you to recreate a much more complete picture of the dialogue, picture, seen from two perspectives almost simultaneously. Often the opening of the interior component of the dialogue in comparison with its external component produces a bombshell.

    Liked by 1 person

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s