In old traditional societies this family philosophy is still a norm

In traditional societies the learning of social boundaries often could be fairly harsh, with the use of physical punishment. Parental authority has traditionally been supported primarily by his father, by force or by harsh treatment. Let’s not idealize this side of traditional education, we will mention only the fact of its existence. Thus, social experiments the adolescent in traditional society was strictly controlled by physical punishment. The same principle served as the state system of criminal sanctions: restriction of mobility, public punishment, the stigma was included in the repertoire of public execution of punishment in Russia until the mid-nineteenth century (the branding of criminals was abolished in 1863, shortly before judicial reform). In modern society, parental authority is usually supported in other ways. Besides the function of social learning is assumed by the state and state institutions. And the usual punishment is expulsion from the community, discontinuation of access to social goods and benefits, which leads mostly to the marginalization of the individual.

However, the new integration is often not possible outside of experiencing the loss of old meanings and values – and the teenager chooses the same initiatic experience. Currently psychological and social initiation associated with the experience of the boundaries of life and death, I suggest as such it is commonly subculture (military, extreme sports, escapist). However, for them it is more an invitation into the subculture, “Paradise for adventurers”, without a guaranteed and legitimate way. Partly initiatic can be called selective service in the armed forces, it saved social formalities initiatic experience: separation from family, borderline period and return in a new capacity (in the Soviet era has also contributed to certain social privileges at accepted into educational institution, etc.).

 

 

 

5 thoughts on “In old traditional societies this family philosophy is still a norm

  1. Analysis of the basis of allocation of the concept of “obedience” in reference and educational literature shows the predominance of the subjective signs of subordination (of the characteristics of the subject resources and power) over an object (characteristics of the content and dynamics of subordination). Ignoring the characteristics of the subject of power in determining subordination in dictionaries makes possible a wide interpretation of the concept. In psychological definitions, by contrast, mainly outlines the subject of power, subordination and limited social interaction.

    Liked by 1 person

    Reply
  2. The most common grounds for the selection of the concept of “obedience” in reference to psychological and non-specialized literature are signs of a subordinate activity of the subject of power and the behavior of the object of power taking place as a result of this active-STI. These characteristics are most significant in defining notions. Rarely in the literature (mostly psychological) takes into account the characteristics of the status, size and openness of the impact of the subject of power.

    Liked by 1 person

    Reply
  3. Clearly there are also different directions in the semantic definition of border-making “submission”. One of them is specialized and involves the most cases of subordination of the individual subject, endowed with legitimate authority. This understanding can be related to the etymology of the word “submission” is formed, probably from the phrase “to be under the Chi-nom”, which indicates the necessity of the existence of “lawful authority” to define the term.
    The opposite direction of the interpretation of the to presupposes a broad interpretation on adoption and is the most typical for dictionaries. Here the exclusion characteristics of the subject of the government’s STI from the definition of “submission” makes possible a wide interpretation of the concepts covered by describing a wide range of situations: from the to of the individual to the internal imperatives of to of objective natural and social environment. With the aim of preserving these semantic shades in the definition of “submission” we think of it denotes the impersonal sound of impact the subject of power as influence “external factors”. In this case, the impact on the individual related factors are considered “external” relative to its actual behavior, needs and cognize (thus, natural conditions, and the internal imperatives of the personality can be “external” in relation to her current needs).

    Liked by 1 person

    Reply
  4. Object among the signs most commonly reported status or psychological dependence of the object from the subject of power, the awareness of choice and belief change reporting, less attention is drawn to the presence of cognitive or motivational conflict. Only in the interpretation of the PTO, the dictionary edited by S. A. Kuznetsova in the definition of subordination was considered a sign of personal consent is subordinate.

    Liked by 1 person

    Reply
  5. Depending on the characteristics affecting the individual’s external factors submission can be conscious and unconscious. In the case where the action of the authorities is perceived by the individual, the subordinate assumes the character of a personal choice and involves mental activity, including cognitive, emotional, and behavioral components that should be considered in the psychological analysis of the submission and the allocation of its forms.

    Liked by 1 person

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s